|
blueeyesyoungheart
Posts: 3417
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 15:51
|
|
|
Is the person who drinks, smokes and overeats less entitled to life saving help than those who, for example, get injured doing this....
Digging into caves miles under ground and getting stuck. Climbing mountains and falling off. Deep sea diving and getting the Bends. Sky diving and crashing to earth. These are only a few of the dangerous sports that costs us all money when help is required. You will think of many more.I am sorry if this has been asked before. Who is less or more deserving? IF THEY ARE.I believe all should be treated the same. You are risking your body either way. |
||
|
The Sage
Posts: 1172
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 15:52
|
|
|
Quoting blueeyesyoungheart (12/01/2012 @ 15:51:01): Is the person who drinks, smokes and overeats less entitled to life saving help than those who, for example, get injured doing this.... Digging into caves miles under ground and getting stuck. Climbing mountains and falling off. Deep sea diving and getting the Bends. Sky diving and crashing to earth. These are only a few of the dangerous sports that costs us all money when help is required. You will think of many more.I am sorry if this has been asked before. Who is less or more deserving? IF THEY ARE.I believe all should be treated the same. You are risking your body either way. I agree, though I do think medics are entitled to lecture us about our lifestyles and habits ![]() |
||
|
mudkid
Posts: 23332
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 15:54
|
|
|
Go outside any hospital and you will see any amount of those same medics puffing away.
|
||
|
Rosema
Posts: 6484
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:01
|
|
|
Is the NHS a charity these days, that rations treatment to the deserving only?
I thought it was paid for by (national) insurance. If you pay your premium you should have the same rights to treatment as everyone else. |
||
|
mudkid
Posts: 23332
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:03
|
|
|
Correct .
However the NHS is on its knees because for one reason it also gives treatment to those who have not paid into the system ie Health tourism. |
||
|
Rosema
Posts: 6484
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:06
|
|
|
Quoting mudkid (12/01/2012 @ 16:03:54): Correct . However the NHS is on its knees because for one reason it also gives treatment to those who have not paid into the system ie Health tourism. So it is partly a charity. That explains a lot about rationing, long waiting lists, etc. |
||
|
Littleotis
Posts: 6861
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:10
|
|
|
Quoting mudkid (12/01/2012 @ 15:54:15): Go outside any hospital and you will see any amount of those same medics puffing away. It may be hypocritical, but their passing on of the consequences of a poor life style is still valid. My take is the deal has been set, if you pay your stamp you get PS Had I heeded (OVER MANY YEARS) the 'Lectures' I perhaps could have avoided the quad heart bypass in September. Broght it upon myself mea culpa. Fair enogh there was a 4 month wait. I'd been killing myself for years whats 4 months. PS The treatment I received I could not fault. Edited |
||
|
blueeyesyoungheart
Posts: 3417
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:11
|
|
|
What of those who have never paid? They then smoke, drink and overeat often very unhealthy food at the taxpayer's expense. THEN! they get ill. What of them?
Of course my belief is we shall all receive the same help. Those dangerous sports can often risk other lives in the rescue, too. |
||
|
mudkid
Posts: 23332
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:14
|
|
|
This is an excellent debate topic a real ethical question.
|
||
|
Rosema
Posts: 6484
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:18
|
|
|
Quoting blueeyesyoungheart (12/01/2012 @ 16:11:41): What of those who have never paid? They then smoke, drink and overeat often very unhealthy food at the taxpayer's expense. THEN! they get ill. What of them? Of course my belief is we shall all receive the same help. Those dangerous sports can often risk other lives in the rescue, too. How do they get out of paying? People who don't pay the mandatory health insurance in my country get a warning letter. If this has no effect, an insurance is contracted in their name by the authorities and the monthly premium is taken from their bank accounts or deducted from their benefits. No insurance=no treatment, except emergency treatment, and it has to be paid for, even if it means bringing in the bailiffs. |
||
|
blueeyesyoungheart
Posts: 3417
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:30
|
|
|
Sorry for not being clear, Rosema. Many do not work. They do not pay.
Free dental care also. |
||
|
Miserable Git
Posts: 181
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:32
|
|
|
I do believe that those that harm themselves while participating in a sport while unsuitably equipped should make a contribution to their rescue.
|
||
|
Rosema
Posts: 6484
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:38
|
|
|
Quoting blueeyesyoungheart (12/01/2012 @ 16:30:41): Sorry for not being clear, Rosema. Many do not work. They do not pay. Free dental care also. If the system allows those who do not pay to be covered by the NHS, then they are technically insured and should have the same rights as everyone else and I can't see why their rights should even be in question. It is not surprising that there isn't enough to go round and that rationing and waiting lists are necessary in such a system. Health care is expensive and all should pay, except children. Everyone pays in my country because they have to. Even vagrants are insured (it's taken out of their food and clothing benefits, though I assume there are a few who don't claim benefits and are not insured). |
||
|
blueeyesyoungheart
Posts: 3417
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:55
|
|
|
If it is taken out of their food and clothing benefits, then it is the same situation as here. THEY are not paying. The state is.
They should all be treated equally though. Especially as it is likely their health will not be so good. BUT the point here is, should these people be treated if they are self abusing? is a dangerous sport classified as self abuse? They can be mighty dangerous. |
||
|
Rosema
Posts: 6484
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 16:59
|
|
|
Quoting blueeyesyoungheart (12/01/2012 @ 16:55:26): If it is taken out of their food and clothing benefits, then it is the same situation as here. THEY are not paying. The state is. The difference is, that everyone is paying health insurance here and all that money goes exclusively into health care. So we all get what we pay for: excellent health care, no rationing, no waiting lists. When costs rise, so do our premiums. Quote: They should all be treated equally though. Especially as it is likely their health will not be so good. BUT the point here is, should these people be treated if they are self abusing? is a dangerous sport classified as self abuse? They can be mighty dangerous. That should not be the question: the question should be: should ANYONE who is self-abusing be treated? I would say we are all self-abusing in some way, be it food, drink, drugs, lifestyle, whatever, so no, you can't go down that road. |
||
|
Littleotis
Posts: 6861
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 17:05
|
|
|
Quoting Miserable Git (12/01/2012 @ 16:32:34): I do believe that those that harm themselves while participating in a sport while unsuitably equipped should make a contribution to their rescue. I think they should at least be given a choice. My son enjoys his caving. He is also part of a Caving and Mountain Rescue team which go out in all weathers and do their bit. Unpaid. So perhaps its Quid Pro Quo? |
||
|
Moonsong
Posts: 8085
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 17:15
|
|
|
Quoting Miserable Git (12/01/2012 @ 16:32:34): I do believe that those that harm themselves while participating in a sport while unsuitably equipped should make a contribution to their rescue. They are often asked and do in fact contribute. My husband had to call on the lifeboat service when he was dismasted off Lands End. He was asked if he would like to make a contribution, and he was only to happy to, for without them, he might have lost his life. |
||
|
Sillibub
Posts: 169
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 17:17
|
|
|
I think cavers, climbers,divers, and those who fly are very much in the minority compared to the smokers (of which I was once one), and the overeaters. If you go into any city and look around you cannot fail to see many very obese people, ofetn youngsters, waddling around, often eating as they go.
On a local bus ride I could not help but notice an enormous young woman who ate a huge bun, drank a fruit juice and finished on a very large iced donut in just 5 minutes. I find it very difficult to compare those who have an accident and require help, to those who take no responsibilty for their own health. There is no easy answer to the question! |
||
|
mudkid
Posts: 23332
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 17:21
|
|
|
Quoting blueeyesyoungheart (12/01/2012 @ 16:30:41): Sorry for not being clear, Rosema. Many do not work. They do not pay. Free dental care also. Or they come from overseas with serious conditions or have mulitple births etc |
||
|
Donna Quixote
Posts: 1691
|
Posted At: 12 Jan 2012 at 17:35
|
|
|
If sports injuries were excluded from free NHS treatment then only people who could afford private health insurance would be able to afford to do sport. Daft idea.
|
||